<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 0-1-N Fallacy</title>
	<link>http://www.chausse.org/2007/12/the-0-1-n-fallacy/</link>
	<description>A blog about web technology and culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.chausse.org/2007/12/the-0-1-n-fallacy/#comment-54026</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chausse.org/2007/12/the-0-1-n-fallacy/#comment-54026</guid>
		<description>I've actually seen more insightful references to the 0-1-N thing that suggests 0, 1, Few, Many -- where the division between Few and Many is extremely subjective.

I'm also at a loss to successfully search for this.  It's a very computer science-y abstraction.

Merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually seen more insightful references to the 0-1-N thing that suggests 0, 1, Few, Many &#8212; where the division between Few and Many is extremely subjective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also at a loss to successfully search for this.  It&#8217;s a very computer science-y abstraction.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
